IDAC Oversight Judge confirms receipt of complaints against Andrea Johnson
The Office of the IDAC Oversight Judge has confirmed that it has received complaints relating to Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) head Advocate Andrea Johnson, saying the matters are being assessed through its established processes in line with its statutory mandate. The Office stressed that the receipt of a complaint does not amount to a finding of wrongdoing or evidence of misconduct.
In a statement issued today, Tuesday, the Office said it was departing from its usual practice of not commenting on complaints because of the exceptional public interest, numerous media enquiries, and the fact that the existence of the complaints was already in the public domain.
The Office said it remains committed to protecting whistleblowers and complainants who make disclosures in good faith, adding that people who report alleged corruption or misconduct should not fear intimidation, prejudice, or retaliation.
It also said there is no fixed rule on whether the identities of individuals who are the subject of complaints should be disclosed, explaining that each matter is considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account public interest, procedural fairness, legality, the rights of affected parties, and the integrity of its processes.
The confirmation comes as Johnson is testifying before the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry, where she faces allegations relating to her conduct as head of IDAC. She has denied wrongdoing and has invoked her constitutional right against self-incrimination on matters that could form part of potential criminal proceedings.
The Office said it would not comment further on the substance of the complaints or any investigative steps that may or may not be taken while the matter remains under consideration.