SABC journalist suspended over R500 exchange for Musa Khawula’s contact details

By Mapaballo Borotho

An SABC journalist has been suspended after allegedly sharing Musa Khawula’s contact details for R500.
Evidence at the Madlanga Commission revealed a payment made by a Gauteng police sergeant, contradicting his earlier denial.
The SABC says the suspension is precautionary as it upholds its values of integrity and accountability.

The South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) has suspended its political journalist, Natasha Phiri, after she allegedly shared Musa Khawula’s contact details in exchange for R500.

The SABC confirmed Phiri’s precautionary suspension in a brief statement on Monday, 23 March 2026.

“The SABC always encourages its staff to uphold the corporation’s values of trust, respect and integrity in all their interactions,” the statement read.

Phiri’s suspension follows revelations that Gauteng police sergeant Fannie Nkosi admitted to paying R500 in exchange for information.

Nkosi had initially denied making any payment during his appearance before the Madlanga Commission last week.

However, evidence before the commission showed that the transaction was made on 6 November 2024. WhatsApp messages presented indicated that Phiri shared Khawula’s contact details.

She later messaged Nkosi, saying, “not even a thank you, sies”, to which Nkosi responded by asking where he could send a “token of appreciation”.

In his initial explanation, Nkosi told the commission he sent the money simply because he knew Phiri, before later claiming it was meant for her to buy a Red Bull.

Why is it important for journalists to respect people’s private information?

Ethical standards: Journalists are bound by ethical standards that require them to treat individuals fairly and with respect. Sharing private information without consent or justification is unethical.

Public Trust: Misuse of private information can erode public trust in the media. Journalists are obliged to protect the privacy of individuals and avoid actions that could compromise their credibility or the integrity of their work, as well as the safety of the general public.