
US President Donald Trump’s administration has ordered US diplomats to lobby against attempts to regulate American technology companies’ handling of foreigners’ data, saying in an internal diplomatic cable that such efforts could interfere with AI-related services.
Experts say the move signals the Trump administration is reverting to a more confrontational approach as some foreign countries seek limits around how Silicon Valley firms process and store their citizens’ personal information — initiatives often described as “data sovereignty” or “data localisation”.
In the state department cable, dated 18 February and signed by US secretary of state Marco Rubio, the agency said such laws would “disrupt global data flows, increase costs and cybersecurity risks, limit artificial intelligence and cloud services, and expand government control in ways that can undermine civil liberties and enable censorship.”
The cable said the Trump administration was pushing for “a more assertive international data policy” and that diplomats should “counter unnecessarily burdensome regulations, such as data localisation mandates”.
The state department did not return a request for comment.
Data sovereignty initiatives have gathered pace, particularly in Europe, amid flaring tensions between the US and the EU over Washington’s protectionist trade policies and support for far-right political parties.
The dominance of US AI companies — many of which draw on massive stores of personal data to power their models — has underlined European concerns around privacy and surveillance. Officials across the continent have increased pressure on American social media giants, too.
Aggressive tack
Bert Hubert, a Dutch cloud computing expert and former member of the board that regulates the Dutch intelligence services, said Europe’s increasing wariness of America’s tech companies may be spurring Washington to take a more aggressive tack.
“Where the previous administration attempted to woo European customers, the current one is demanding that Europeans disregard their own data privacy regulations that could hinder American business,” he said.
Read: Trump space order puts the moon back at centre of US, China rivalry
Data sovereignty laws vary in scope. Some impose rules around where information is kept by requiring that data collected from a certain nation only be stored within that country. Others put restrictions around how data is shared, limiting its distribution to foreign companies. The EU’s 2018 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), for example, imposed restrictions on transferring Europeans’ data abroad and has led to a series of stiff fines on American tech firms.
Rubio’s cable cited GDPR as an example of a rule that imposed “unnecessarily burdensome data processing restrictions and cross-border data flow requirements”.

It also said China was “bundling enticing technology infrastructure projects with restrictive data policies that expand its global influence and access to international data for surveillance and strategic leverage”. The cable did not provide much more detail, but China has over the past few years tightened regulations over how its companies store and transfer user data.
The Chinese embassy in Washington said it was not familiar with the cable but that Beijing “has always attached great importance to cybersecurity and data security”. The European Commission in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.
The cable, whose headline described it as an “action request”, tasked American diplomats with tracking the development of proposals to restrict cross-border data flows and supplied talking points promoting the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules Forum, a group established in 2022 by the US, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Japan and others “to support the free flow of data and effective data protection and privacy globally”. The forum did not respond to requests for comment.
The cable is the latest in a series of initiatives aimed at thwarting European regulation of the digital sphere.
Last year, Rubio ordered diplomats to whip up opposition to the EU’s Digital Services Act, which aims to make the internet safer by compelling major social media firms to remove illegal content, such as extremist or child sexual abuse material. Last week, Reuters reported that the US planned to launch an online portal intended to help Europeans and others bypass the censorship of material including alleged hate speech and terrorist propaganda. — Raphael Satter, (c) 2026 Reuters
Get breaking news from TechCentral on WhatsApp. Sign up here.
